Using Trends in Biometric Data to Predict Interest in Enrolling in an Employer-Sponsored National Diabetes Prevention Program Focusing on Diet and Exercise: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors

  • Victoria Zigmont Department of Health, Exercise Science and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, USA
  • Abigail Shoben Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, USA
  • Gail Kaye Division of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, USA
  • Steven Clinton Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology,
  • Randall Harris Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, USA
  • Susan Olivo-Marston Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology Springfield, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/jepublichealth.2024.09.01.12

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based lifestyle programs including the Diabetes Prevention Program can delay an individual’s risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Identifying which individuals are less likely to enroll in these programs and tailoring recruitment approaches to encourage participation among those with perceived barriers is an effective strategy to increase engagement in health promotion. This study aimed to identify the pre-enrollment differences in biometric trends between individuals with prediabetes who did and did not express interest in free worksite diabetes prevention programs.
Subjects and Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among individuals in the Midwest enrolled in a private insurance plan from 2011 to 2014. Data was combined from annual biometric screenings and a health survey. Demographic characteristics were summarized for the study population (n=2,066). The dependent variable for this study was interest in the DPP, while the independent variables included body mass index, waist circumference, body weight, lipid measurements, and blood pressure. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were used to compare bio-metric trajectories for body mass index, waist circumference, body weight, lipid measurements (triglycerides and cholesterol), and blood pressure for the two groups.
Results: No differences were observed in biometric trends for those who did and did not choose to enroll in the free worksite program.
Conclusion: Examining pre-enrollment biometric trend data is a relatively novel approach to evaluating engagement in health programs. More research is needed to understand how this information can be used to identify an individual’s interest in enrolling in health programming.

References

Aicker K, Cutler D, Song Z (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff. 29(2): 1–8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626.

Beck AJ, Hirth RA, Jenkins KR, Sleeman KK, Zhang W. Factors Associated With Participation in a University Worksite Wellness Program. Am J Prev Med. 51(1): e1–e11. doi 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.028.

CDC (2015) Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program (DPRP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Herman WH, Villatoro C, Joiner KL, Mc-Ewen LN (2023). Uptake, retention, and outcomes of the National Diabetes Prevention Program by enrollee characteristics and program type. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 203: 110835. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110835.

Janz NK, Becker MH (1984). The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 11(1): 1-47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101.

Joiner KL, McEwen LN, Hurst TE, Adams MP, Herman WH (2022). Domains from the health belief model predict enrollment in the National Diabetes Prevention Program among insured adults with prediabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 36(7):108220.

Ritchie ND, Sauder KA, Fabbri S (2017). Reach and Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program for Young Women. Am J Prev Med. 53(5): 714-718. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.013.

Taradash J, Kramer M, Molenaar D, Arena V, Vanderwood K, Kriska AM. (2015). Recruitment for a Diabetes Prevention Program translation effort in a work-site setting. Contemp Clin Trials. 41.: 204–210.doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.010.

The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (1999) The Diabetes Prevention Program: Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 22(4): 623–634.

Tice JA, Chapman R, Shore KK, Seidner M, Ollendorf D, Weissberg J, Pearson S (2016) Diabetes Prevention Programs: Effectiveness and Value. Final Evidence Report and Meeting Summary. Inst Clin Econ Rev.

US Department of Health and Human Services (2020) National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020. National Diabetes Statistics Report: 2.

Venkataramani M, Pollack CE, Yeh HC, Maruthur NM (2019). Prevalence and Correlates of Diabetes Prevention Program Referral and Participation. Am J Prev Med. 56(3):452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.005.

Zigmont VA, Shoben AB, Kaye GL, Snow RJ, Clinton SK, Harris RE, Olivo-Marston SE (2017). An Evaluation of Reach for a Work Site Implementation of the National Diabetes Prevention Program Focusing on Diet and Exercise. Am J Health Promot. 32(6):1417-1424. doi: 10.1177/0890117117733348.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Zigmont, V., Shoben, A., Kaye, G., Clinton, S., Harris, R., & Olivo-Marston, S. (2024). Using Trends in Biometric Data to Predict Interest in Enrolling in an Employer-Sponsored National Diabetes Prevention Program Focusing on Diet and Exercise: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 9(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.26911/jepublichealth.2024.09.01.12

Issue

Section

Articles