Effect of Robot Assistive Therapy on Hand Functional Ability in Stroke Patients: Meta-Analysis


  • Haris Sutopo Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Bhisma Murti Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Argyo Demartoto Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret




Background: Stroke is a neurological deficit disease caused by bleeding or blockage of blood vessels in the brain which can cause disability or death. Vascular injuries cause various neurological disorders, motor disorders and functional disorders of the hands which are very necessary to carry out daily activities. Robot Assistive Therapy as a breakthrough in stroke rehabilitation technology can be used as an alternative therapy method for post-stroke rehabilitation. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the use of robotic assistive therapy and conventional therapy on the functional abilities of stroke patients' hands. Subjects and Method: This study used a systematic review and meta-analysis design using the PRISMA flowchart guidelines and the PICO model (Population = Stroke patients. Intervention = Robot Assistive Therapy. Comparison = Conventional therapy. Outcome = Hand functional ability). The article search process was carried out using databases from PubMed, Science Direct, AJOT, Springer Link, and Google Scholar. The keywords used are “Robot Assistive Therapy” AND “stroke” AND “hand function” AND “randomized controlled trial” AND “Fugl Meyer Assessment”. The inclusion criteria in this study were full-text articles using the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design from 2012 to 2022. The corresponding articles were then critically reviewed and analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A meta-analysis was conducted on 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Belgium, Italy, Japan, Germany, Lithuania and Switzerland with a total sample of 537 stroke patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in effectiveness between the use of robot assistive therapy and conventional therapy in improving the functional abilities of stroke patients' hands (SMD= -0.02; 95% CI= -0.42 to 0.38; p= 0.930). Conclusion: There is no difference in effectiveness between the use of assistive therapy robots and conventional therapy in improving the functional abilities of stroke patients' hands. Keywords: robot assistive therapy, stroke, hand functional abilities, meta-analysis Correspondence: Haris Sutopo, Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Email: hartop4wd@gmail.com. Telepon: +628155010610.


Aggogeri F, Mikolajczyk T, O’Kane J (2019). Robotics for rehabilitation of hand movement in stroke survivors. Adv. Mech. Eng. 11(4): 1–14. doi: 10.1177/168781401841921

AHA (2021). 2021 Heart disease and stroke statistics update fact sheet american heart association research heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). American Heart Association.

Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Loreti S, Pecchioli C, Cecchi F, Montesano A, et al. (2020). Upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Neurol Phys Ther. 44(1): 3–14. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295.

Bertani R, Melegari C, De-Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò R S (2017). Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 38(9): 1561–1569. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5.

Carpinella I, Lencioni T, Bowman T, Bertoni R, Turolla A, Ferrarin M, Jonsdottir J (2020). Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 17(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-0646-1.

Coupland AP, Thapar A, Qureshi MI, Jenkins H, Davies AH (2017). The definition of stroke. J. R Soc Med. 110(1): 9–12. doi: 10.1177/0141076816680121.

Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, Griškevicius J, Juoce-vicius A (2018). Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Technology and Health Care. 26(S2): S533–S542. doi: 10.3233/THC-182500.

Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Stoquart G, Detrem-bleur C, Jacquemin, G, Palumbo S, Frederick A, et al. (2019). Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 62(5): 313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.04.002.

Duruöz MT (2019). Hand function a practical guide to assessment. In M. T. Duruöz (Ed.), Springer Nature Switzerland AG (Second Edi). Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17000-4_7.

Franceschini M, Goffredo M, Pournajaf S, Paravati S, Agosti M, De Pisi F, Galafate D, et al. (2018). Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients. PLoS ONE. 13(2): 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193235.

Franck JA, Smeets RJ, Seelen HAM (2017). Changes in arm-hand function and arm-hand skill performance in patients after stroke during and after rehabilitation. In PLoS ONE. 12(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179453.

Hesse S, Heß A, Werner CC, Kabbert N, Buschfort R (2014). Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 28(7): 637–647. doi:10.1177/0269215513516967.

Kiran S (2012). What is the nature of poststroke language recovery and reorganization? ISRN Neurology, 2012: 1–13. doi: 10.5402/2012/78687.

Lindsay MP, Norrving B, Sacco RL, Brainin M, Hacke W, Martins S, Pandian J, et al. (2019). World stroke organization (WSO): Global stroke fact sheet 2019. Int J Stroke. 14(8): 806–817. doi: 10.1177/1747493019881353.

Maris A, Coninx K, Seelen H, Truyens V, De Weyer T, Geers R, Lemmens M, et al. (2018). The impact of robot-mediated adaptive I-TRAVLE training on impaired upper limb function in chronic stroke and multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabilitation Assist Tech. 13(1):1–9. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1278467.

Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B (2018). Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2018(9): doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5.

Ojaghihaghighi S, Vahdati S, Mikaeilpour A, Ramouz A (2017). Comparison of neurological clinical manifestation in patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. World J Emerg Med. 8(1): 34. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.006.

Orihuela-Espina F, Roldán GF, Sánchez-Villavicencio I, Palafox L, Leder R, Sucar LE, Hernández-Franco J (2016). Robot training for hand motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. J. Hand Ther. 29(1): 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.11.006.

Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, et al. (2020).Neurocognitive robot-assis-ted rehabilitation of hand function: A randomized control trial on motor re-covery in subacute stroke. J. Neuro-eng Rehabil, 17(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.

Sale P, Mazzoleni S, Lombardi V, Galafate D, Massimiani MP, Posteraro F, Damiani C, Franceschini M (2014). Recovery of hand function with robot-assisted therapy in acute stroke pati-ents: A randomized-controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 37(3): 236–242. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000059.

Saragih ID, Everard G, Tzeng H, Saragih, IS, Lee BO (2022). Efficacy of Robots-Assisted Therapy in Patients with Stroke. J Cardiovasc Nurs, Publish Ah (0):1–26. doi: 10.1097/jcn.0000000000000945.

Takahashi K, Domen K, Sakamoto T, Toshima M, Otaka Y, Seto M, Irie K, et al. (2016). Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia: An Exploratory Randomized Trial. Stroke. 47(5): 1385–1388. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012520.

Takebayashi T, Takahashi K, Amano S, Gosho M, Sakai M, Hashimoto K, Hachisuka K, et al. (2022). Robot-assisted training as self-training for upper-limb hemiplegia in chronic stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 53(7): 2182–2191. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037260.

Yakub F, Ahmad AZ, Mori Y (2014). Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future. Int J. Rehabi Res. 37(1):9–21. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000035.

Zhang L, Jia G, Ma J, Wang S, Cheng L (2022). Short and long-term effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb motor function and activity of daily living in patients post-stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Neuroeng Rehabil. 19(1):1–22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01058-8.

Zhang ZG, Chopp M (2016). Exosomes in stroke pathogenesis and therapy. J. Clin Invest. 126(4): 1190–1197. doi: 10.1172/JCI81133.




How to Cite

Sutopo, H., Murti, B., & Demartoto, A. (2023). Effect of Robot Assistive Therapy on Hand Functional Ability in Stroke Patients: Meta-Analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 8(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.26911/jepublichealth.2023.08.02.06




Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>